Category Archives: Virginia

Russell Baker — some quotes about life, humanity, and pierogies

Even as a child I consumed the newspapers. Yes, the comics were interesting but as someone that got involved while still quite young in 1968′s presidential election — at the age of 12 — I lived to read the serious commentary and thought pieces.

One of my favorites on the commentary page has always been fellow Virginian Russell Baker.

Baker was never a George Will or a Jack Anderson. Baker was thoughtful farce. Baker had the ability to sum up entire philosophies in as little as an entire sentence. Sometimes. He was the person that you always wanted around the dining room table for long chatty meals, and endless coffees afterwards.

Russell Baker is probably closer to Mark Twain and to Dave Barry than to the other great minds that mislead us. While it amazed me that he was included on the same page with the serious columnists I am happy to report that I probably learned more from Baker than all the others (although I never missed a George Will or William Safire column, even after Safire became a continuous grump after the late 1990s).

Some Russell Baker observations on life, humanity and pierogies:

    “In America nothing dies easier than tradition.”

    “The goal of all inanimate objects is to resist man and ultimately defeat him.”

    “Usually, terrible things that are done with the excuse that progress requires them are not really progress at all, but just terrible things.”

    “One of the many burdens of the person professing Christianity has always been the odium likely to be heaped upon him by fellow Christians quick to smell out, denounce and punish fraud, hypocrisy and general unworthiness among those who assert the faith. In ruder days, disputes about what constituted a fully qualified Christian often led to sordid quarrels in which the disputants tortured, burned and hanged each other in the conviction that torture, burning, and hanging were Christian things to do…”

    “The only thing I was fit for was to be a writer, and this notion rested solely on my suspicion that I would never be fit for real work, and that writing didn’t require any.”

    “The Government cannot afford to have a country made up entirely of rich people, because rich people pay so little tax that the Government would quickly go bankrupt. This is why Government men always tell us that labor is man’s noblest calling. Government needs labor to pay its upkeep.”

    “Happiness is a small and unworthy goal for something as big and fancy as a whole lifetime, and should be taken in small doses.”

    “An educated person is one who has learned that information almost always turns out to be at best incomplete and very often false, misleading, fictitious, mendacious – just dead wrong.”

    “A group of politicians deciding to dump a President because his morals are bad is like the Mafia getting together to bump off the Godfather for not going to church on Sunday.”

    “Live by publicity, you’ll probably die by publicity.” >> Are you listening Newt?

    “You can’t enjoy light verse with a heavy heart.”

    “A solved problem creates two new problems, and the best prescription for happy living is not to solve any more problems than you have to.”

    “All politicians are humble, and seldom let you forget it. They go around the country boasting about their humility. They are proud of their humility. Many are downright arrogant about their humility and insist that it qualifies them to be President.”

    “Inanimate objects can be classified scientifically into three major categories: those that don’t work, those that break down and those that get lost. The goal of all inanimate objects is to resist man and ultimately to defeat him, and the three major classifications are based on the method each object uses to achieve its purpose. As a general rule, any object capable of breaking down at the moment when it is most needed will do so.”

Leave a Comment

Filed under Civil Society, Virginia

One Year Later — I’m not Satan, and you ain’t Lucifer … even though you drink coffee, tea and/or koolaid.

One year ago today on a very cold, snowy Saturday I got up and went to the national kickoff of the Coffee Party, here in Prince William, Virginia.

Later that day I sat down and wrote my observations in “I’m not Satan, and you ain’t Lucifer … even though you drink coffee, tea and/or koolaid.”

I also explored the TEA Party, even becoming a local chapter founder and coordinator.

Have since gone inactive with both TEA and Coffee. But along the way I met some of the most amazing people.

The Prince William Coffee Party had a very short life. Stuff happens. However, I have made a number of lasting relationships with these folks. And I look forward to working with them for years to come.

As an independent-minded American I have questions. Am looking for answers. Life is complex. I want more than simplistic answers.

====================
++++++++++++++++++++
====================

I’m not Satan, and you ain’t Lucifer … even though you drink coffee, tea and/or koolaid.
– 2010.03.13

OK, so I did it. I went to the local Coffee Party on Saturday, March 13th.

I’m conservative with a long track record of supporting whatever walks the right side of the street. Although born a Democrat, back in 1972 I even joined the ‘Democrats for Nixon’ campaign as a highschooler — in Florida there were no Republicans elected to state office until 1978. None. Long story short: I have never identified with liberal or Democratic groups, even though I was born a Democrat — registering as a Republican only when that other former Democrat ‘God bless Ronald Reagan’ ran for president.

Bottomline: I wasn’t sure how these Coffee folks would take to someone with an NRA ballcap, who openly describes themself as conservative, or how they would deal with someone willing to discuss issues from a more conservative perspective. Certainly I have seen how more liberal-minded people were treated by the opposing view in my community — not a pretty sight.

There were a few things said by fellow attendees that made my ears twitch. At one point a group moderator even pointed me out and said “OK, so you smiling. So why the smile?” Blink. Blink. “Oh, crap” thought I. “She mistaked my smirk for a smile.” Time to put up or to shut up. So I did. Blink. Blink. “OK, well that’s a helpful perspective to understand a different view”, said she … and on we moved in the conversation. Hmmm …

Our group conversation focused on issues that we all individually believe should be of interest and worthy of group investigation. The issues added up: 15, 20, 25 … perhaps 30 different issues got listed. Then each participant got two votes to select two issues that they personally would like the group to focus on. Issues with the most votes were rolled into four study groups.

Hmmm … so the rumors that I heard beforehand that this was just a disguised group pimping for liberal causes or the Democratic party were … they were … bogus. Solidly bogus.

By the day’s end I found myself in the ‘Financial Oversight’ issue study group responsible for issues such as taxation, banking regulation, etc.

Boom! So now we would get our agenda if it were ever to happen. Someone would surely guide the study groups to what breadcrumbs should be followed. Nope. Didn’t happen.

We six group members decided what topics we wanted to study, set our own agenda for meeting, created a Facebook page to exchange info and to build whitepapers that can be used within the group and for approaching our legislators. The Coffee leadership didn’t even get involved in asking what we had decided upon. They’ll find out when we report back later in the month.


I’m not Satan, and you ain’t Lucifer … even though you drink coffee, tea and/or koolaid.

America stands at a crossroads. We are always arriving at some crossroad but the issues today are huge and imminently in front of us. The outcome will directly affect our children and grandchildren, leaving them incredible debt. We owe trillions to foreign countries and investors (and to Americans, too) — almost $2 trillion is due in October 2010 to pay back money borrowed in the early 2000s.

We have major healthcare issues that are at an impasse; our system is one of the best medicine that people can buy. Yet we rank just ahead of Cuba in the general health of our population. Obamacare to me is an abomination that will bankrupt the country and yet the alternative is “personal responsibility” — even though healthcare insurers are a monopolistic industry and some recently announced hikes of 25-36% in annual premiums.

Enough of labels. Enough of political party hacks and support groups — both the Democratic and Republican parties are focused on the next election. Neither can be trusted to hold real discussions and to make hard decisions. Each put party before country.

As for all the liberals, moderates, conservatives and wingers of every stripe: I’m not Satan, and you ain’t Lucifer … even though you drink coffee, tea and/or koolaid.

If you want to sit down with me and discuss issues then good. Check your name calling and label machines at the door — I don’t have time for you or that if that is what you are about.

Here is what I am about: God bless the U.S. Constitution, the 10th Amendment has real meaning, don’t put your hands in my pockets to pay for programs — unless we are both paying the same, and we should pay as we go. I don’t believe that “cut taxes” is the answer to everything, but taxes should be minimal and government intrusion into our lives should also be. But be assured “we” includes both you and me. We are both Americans — and I’ll drink any beer that you buy me. … :^)

I’ll meet with you any time and any place — except Sunday afternoons when I’m either enjoying my Second Amendment rights or playing soccer, or doing both.

BTW – I drink both tea and coffee. Both are OK with me.


This post by Bill Golden, aka Bill4DogCatcher.com, an independent observer of American political life, economics, and workforce issues.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Coffee Party, TEA Party, Virginia

Health Care Reform Act Headed for the Supreme Court due to Partial Victory by Virginia Constitutional Challenge? Yes.

by Bill Golden
Bill4DogCatcher.com and JeffersonConservative.com

The Health Care Reform Act, AKA ObamaCare as it is called by both supporters and detractors, has stumbled badly in its attempt to fend off a constitutional challenge posed by Virginia.

On Monday, August 2nd, 2010, U.S. District Judge Henry Hudson denied Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius’s motion to dismiss a lawsuit brought by the state of Virginia challenging the new health care insurance law. His ruling stated that it is far from certain Congress has the authority to compel Americans to buy insurance and penalize those who don’t.

The stumble comes from the entire Health Care Reform Act (HCRA) depending upon the individual mandate for the HCRA to have meaning. Please remember that Virginia chose carefully as to how it challenged the HCRA’s constitutionality: it did not challenge the power of the Congress to pass such a bill; Virginia challenged the constitutionality of requiring individuals to have health insurance.

Failing to overcome Virginia’s challenge, the fate of the HCRA now goes to a court trial to begin October 18th, 2010. Win or lose, both parties will undoubtedly appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.

The effective outcome is that many states will delay beginning to implement the HCRA until its constitutionality is determined. Just as Arizona is stymied in its ability to implement portions of SB1070 so is it the same for the HCRA whose first requirements and benefits went into effect as of July 2010.

My view is that Arizona will ultimately prevail at the Supreme Court level and Virginia may well also prevail.

Back on March 21st 2010, just hours before the vote was taken in the House on the Senate version of the HCRA, I gave my opinion and an overview of the constitutional issues facing the HCRA.

My opinion then and now:  “As much as I believe health care reform is needed, and needed now, the senate version of health care reform is both unconstitutional and overreaching. If the senate bill should be passed by the House then it will be more of chimeral victory that will be defeated in the SCOTUS due to its many flawed provisions, rather than the total sum value of its intent.”

For more info: What the press is saying about this development.


Bill Golden is an independent observer of American politics, trends and economics. Bill’s political views meet at the crossroads of conservatism, libertarianism and being a practical centrist. No longer a member of any political party, Bill would undoubtedly be declared a DINO if he were a Democrat and a RINO if he were Republican.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Health Care, Taxes & Taxation, Virginia

Independents Picked Winners in November 2009 Election

November 3, 2009 was a good day for the GOP. Several strong wins for key governorships, a clean sweep of state officers in Virginia, and yet a historical loss in NY-23 which has been Republican since 1867.

So where is America going?

– Women voted Democratic in both the New Jersey and Virginia governor races. Men voted Republican. Both sexes favored their candidates by the simplest of majorities: 51-52%.

– Young voters did not turn out in huge numbers, but voters under the age of 30 voted Democratic in both New Jersey and Virginia by a simple majority.

– The majority of voters were between the age of 45-60, an age group which favors Republicans.

– Black Americans stayed home in Virginia. Only 15% went to the polls. Democrats worked hard to mobilize minority voters and women to oppose a demonized Republican candidate. Women did vote Democratic but the question is whether the Democrats should have focused on issues rather than ‘we know we got your vote if we could just get you to the polls’ — obviously, a failed strategy.

– Atlanta has a white population of 38% yet has given the edge to its first white mayoral candidate since 1973. A runoff is required so stay tuned for the final outcome.

– Coloradans rejected the power of government to seize people’s cars just because they drive without a license.

– Maine referendum repeals last year’s law legalizing gay marriage: 53% to 47%.

– An openly gay mayoral candidate in Houston, Texas finishes in the lead but must still compete in a runoff.

– Not only conservatives but very liberal organizations turned on Dede Scozzafava in NY-23. Dede was given an award by ‘The Susan B. Anthony List’ for support of abortion rights, but the organization spent $142,000 in advertising attacking her in her bid for NY-23.

– Power of newspapers – does it matter any longer? The Washington Post strongly endorsed a number of candidates in Virginia’s election. Some would say the Post went out of its way to target those that it didn’t endorse. Candidates getting the Post’s endorsement lost.

– Were the Virginia and New Jersey governorship races a decision on President Obama’s performance? Obama remains popular in both states well above the 50% mark. Voters in both states said their #1 concern was the economy: New Jersey 90% said economy, and 85% in Virginia.

Independents Picked The Winners

The biggest story really is that it was independent voters that decided 2009′s winners and losers. Not only were there a number of strong independent campaigns, but independents picked the winners while party partisans overwhelming voted for their own.

Exit polls in Virginia showed that 94% of Republicans voted Republican and 95% of Democrats voted Democratic. With an edge in registered voters then you would think that the Democrats would have won.

New Jersey and Virginia exit polls show that independents overwhelmingly voted Republican. Virginia’s McDonnell got 62% of independent votes, and Chris Christie got 58% in New Jersey.

If 2009′s election was an indication of things to come in 2010 then the message was clear: reach out to your base, but if you don’t win the independent vote then you WILL NOT WIN.

Independents vote issues. If you want their vote then you, we, someone needs to answer these questions: How is this good for America? How is this good for me?


This blog  by Bill Golden, Bill4DogCatcher.com, an independent fed up with party politics but friendly to the concept of smaller government, maximum personal freedoms, Main Street over Wall Street, fiscal responsibility and community first.

2 Comments

Filed under Democratic Party, Economics, Election 2010, Election 2012, New Jersey, New York, Politics, Republican Party, Virginia

Republican Gains & The Pelosi Barometer … If 2010 Were Today

A recent Gallup Poll shows that Republicans made some significant gains in brand identity over the summer (1). Republican-friendly voters have risen 3%.

Per Gallup, 42% of Americans now identify themselves, or lean, towards being Republican. Republicans started 2009 off with just 39%.

Republicans last held a 42% identity ranking in late 2006 — so while the most recent 2009 numbers are an improvement, this is also the same level of public support as during the disastrous 2006 elections.

History: Based upon the 2000 and 2004 elections, Republicans must run at least toe-to-toe with the Democrats in voter party self-identification popularity to have a chance at winning. With voters almost evenly splitting their loyalties in 2000 and 2004, only Florida’s questionable votes pushed Republicans over the top in 2000, and Ohio slid in at the last minute in 2004 to give Bush a win over Kerry. In each election Republicans were virtually tied with voters equally identifying with each political party (2 point difference in 2000, 0 point difference in 2004). (1, 2)

Curent Poll Interpretation: After a brutal summer of debate in which Republicans and friends were constantly on attack against the Democrats, the Democrat’s current lead of 6% essentially means: Republicans would soundly lose if an election were held today.

Other polling puts the current situation into more specific perspective. If the 2009/2010 elections were held today (3):

  • Senate: Republicans would lose 2 seats (Kentucky and Ohio) and gain 1 seat (Colorado).
  • House: Republicans would gain 2 seats; winning in Idaho, Maryland and New Hampshire but losing Alabama.
  • Governors: Republicans drop one governorship: winning in Michigan and Virginia, but losing in Hawaii, Rhode Island and Nevada.

The challenge for Republicans is to attract more independents, just as it is for the Democrats to do so. Neither political party can win without the independent vote.

Many Republicans are counting upon 2010 to upset the Democratic control of Congress. History suggests that it should.

About Republican chances in 2010, David Moore of Pollster.com (aggregator and analysis of various polls) has a different interpretation: “It would be a political miracle if the Democrats did not lose seats in the 2010 Congressional elections, yet the polls so far suggest that scenario is doubtful at best.” If Moore is right then Republicans must reach out to even more independents, and Democrats too, if it hopes to keep in 2010 what congressional seats it already has.

The Pelosi Barometer: Perhaps one of the most interesting barometers that I pay attention to is the popularity of Nancy Pelosi. More than any other Democrat, ultra-conservative Republicans and their allies love to attack and to mock Nancy Pelosi. Bad news for ultra-conservatives: her popularity is rising, and rising faster than that of Republicans. So while the Republicans have moved forward by 3% with the general public since January 2009, Nancy Pelosi’s popularity has risen 7% just since August 2009 (4). With numbers like that, Republicans should have a lot to think about.

Sources:

1 – Washington Post, Morning Fix: Republicans’ Independent Gains?, http://voices.washingtonpost.com/thefix/morning-fix/morning-fix-republicans-indepe.html

2 – Pew Research, Fewer Voters Identify as Republicans, http://pewresearch.org/pubs/773/fewer-voters-identify-as-republicans

3 – Pollster.com, Likely Voters and Mid-Term Elections, Part I, http://www.pollster.com/blogs/likely_voters/

4 – Rasmussen, 57% View Pelosi Unfavorably, But That’s An Improvement, http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/mood_of_america/congressional_favorability_ratings

Leave a Comment

Filed under Democratic Party, Election 2010, Maryland, Politics, Republican Party, Virginia

Voter Factoids – The Republican 2010/2012 Challenge, Part I

As Republicans move closer to 2010 there are some things that they must keep in mind as the GOP appeals for support from both Republican voters and the general public:

Republican voters are not monolithic, and can be quite contrarian. While the right tends to make a lot of noise, support for President Obama dropped the most among Republican moderates and liberals (-22%) between June and July 2009. Support among conservatives dropped -12%. (4)

Without any majority appeal to voter groups other than white Americans over the age of 40, a troubling indicator for the GOP is “income”. White Americans with income above $75,000 actually increased their support for President Obama between June and July 2009 (+2%), whereas support dropped 10% among those earning less than $75,000. (4)

With exception to AK, GA, ID, LA, MS, OK, UT, and WY, young voters since 2004 have strongly or overwhelmingly (70%+) voted Democratic. There is a virtual tie among young voter loyalties in AR and WV. (3) Historically, young voters tend to stay with the same party if they vote two or more times in a row for that party. Without a major shift in demographics towards the GOP, even should the Republicans pull an upset win within the next 4-6 years it may be a short-lived victory once younger voters enter their 30s and 40s — at which time voters become more likely to vote.

Within Republican-controlled red states, but not Democratic blue states (1):

  • Income tends to be a predictor of how important issues are. The higher a voter’s income the more important specific issues are to the voter.
  • Lower income voters are less likely to lean heavily one way or the other on issues other than economic.
  • Issues become more important the more often a person attends church.

Media concentration within these four major markets — New York, Maryland, Virginia, and California — results in issue discussion saturation which tends to negate the relationship between income and issues; translation: appeals to voters must be broad-based across the income spectrum. It is impossible for someone living in these regions not to be constantly exposed to an issue’s pros and cons. (1) Due to their size, these four states contain a major portion of electoral votes and are must win battlegrounds.

Black middle-class urban voters focus heavily on social issues regardless of income or age, whereas white voters tend to vote on economic issues. GOP focus on primarily economic issues does not have traction with the black urban middle class. (2)

Sources:

1 – How Republican and Democratic Voters Differ, Apr 2009, http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/04/20/how_republican_and_democratic_voters_differ/

2 – Day, S. D. , 2004-04-15 “Urban Black Voters v. Black Middle Class Voters: Is a Second Realignment Possible to the Republican Party”, http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/0/8/2/4/6/p82462_index.html

3 – U.S. Election Atlas, http://www.uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=100143.0

4 – Pew Research Center, 2009, http://people-press.org/report/?pageid=1559

1 Comment

Filed under California, Democratic Party, Economics, Election 2010, Election 2012, Future, Maryland, New York, Progressive Movement, Republican Party, Virginia

Health Care – When The Fight Resumes, Fall 2009 … Do Conservatives Have An Argument?

Now that Congress postponed in late July putting forth a national health care plan, we have more time to think through this.

Below is how I see the national health care option argument as it exists today.

SITUATION #1

A majority of Americans, however slight the majority, would like to see the U.S. have some form of national health care plan option. Increased unemployment in Fall 2009 could boost those support numbers, as long as President Obama and Congress are seen as making a good faith attempt at economic stabilization.

SITUATION #2

With a Democratic president and a strong majority in both the Senate and the House of Representatives, the Democrats could pass a national health plan without any Republican votes. This assumes Democrats can reach agreement. The pressure will be on in late 2009 to either pass or to suspend the campaign for a national health care plan. The Republicans have been totally ineffective so far in making a case against Obamacare. Republican natural allies, the Democratic Blue Dogs, have found themselves doing all of the heavy lifting as Republicans have spurned almost all attempts at bipartisanship or even working closely with the Blue Dogs.

COUNTERARGUMENT

The predominate counterargument is conservative. The conservative argument is that government should not do for people what people should do for themselves. The argument is also made that there are publicly available options to provide a safety net to the uninsured and to those unable to afford medical care;  business and the free market is more efficient at providing better and less expensive services than the government.

PREDICTION: The Democrats will come to some agreement prior to early 2010. While this will be too late for the 2010 Federal Budget Year, it will be a decision that conservatives and Republicans will be unable to roll back even should they do well in 2010 mid-term elections.

MY POSITION: I oppose a national plan. However, I believe that major reforms of the health care industry are not possible. The health care insurers like things the way they are (438% increase in profits since 2000), and they have invested heavily in funding non-reform with more than $440,000,000 given to Republicans since 2000 in campaign contributions.

THE CHALLENGE FOR OPPONENTS

Democratic Blue Dogs: Generally agree that national health care reform is needed but are very sensitive to anything which increases the national debt, and which does not seem like actual reform. Blue Dogs have the greatest chance to shape the winning argument.

Republicans: Chaos reigns within the party and they have no plan at all. Period.

Conservatives: The traditional conservative argument does not hold up under close inspection: publicly available resources are largely non-existent. They have no credible argument — see example of Virginia below.

Independents: Independents tend to take the Blue Dog position.

VIRGINIA & THE CONSERVATIVE MYTH

Virginia has much to be happy about. It has largely escaped the worst of the 2007-2009 Recession. It was, and remains, among the Top 3 most economically blessed states in the Union. And Virginia seems poised to grow in both wealth, affluence and influence. Virginia was just named the “Top State for Business” for the second time in three years.

Yet, Virginia has a health care issue. Many Virginians do not see the problem as pronounced as some other areas since 1 in 8 Virginians receive medical care through affiliation with current or past military service. Approximately 1 in 7 Virginians are not covered by health insurance of any kind.

The conservative arguments holds that where there is demand there will be a supply of service to meet that demand. It is also argued that private groups are already providing many of these services; a public health insurance plan would just hurt the efforts of these groups.

So how well does the conservative argument hold up? The common availability of public resources by private groups is largely myth.

Below is an example of the Free Clinic network in Virginia. A Free Clinic is a private, nonprofit, community-based or faith-based organization that provides compassionate, quality health care at little or no charge to low-income, uninsured people through heavy use of volunteer health professionals and partnerships with other health-related organizations.

After reviewing Virginia’s “safety net” health care network below, the nation’s second largest such network, you tell me how strong is the conservative argument of supply-and-demand, private providers work best.

===============================
Virginia – Population 7,700,000
===============================

– 1,061,000 uninsured Virginians.

– Total clinics statewide: 55.

– Virginia has the 2nd largest network of free health clinics in the USA.

– Virginia counties with no free health clinic at all: 30+

– Ratio of uninsured Virginians PER clinic: 20,000:1

– Efficiency: $5.40 of services provided for every $1 received; 75% private sector funding, many services are contributed.

– Eligibility for use: A family of 4 may earn no more than $25-31,000 (150-200% below the poverty level).

– Virginians can find a master list of free health care clinics online at http://www.vafreeclinics.org

2 Comments

Filed under Democratic Party, Election 2010, Employment, Health Care, Republican Party, Virginia

Republicans Need 10% Gain To Win Virginia 2009 Governor Race

It is time to focus.

It is time to campaign on ideas and policies that Virginians want to vote for in November.

Victory for Republicans requires that about 10% of the electorate swing its support to Bob McDonnell, Republican candidate for governor, to be assured a win.

McDonnell currently lags his Democratic opponent by 6% (Rasmussen, June 2009) — and curiously one in four Virginian Republicans remain undecided as to whom they will vote for.

McDonnell has five major challenges to address in order to win in November 2009.

McDonnell has five major challenges to address in order to win :

Jobs & Unemployment – Virginia has been spared much of the pain that unemployment has brought to the rest of America. Current Virginia unemployment is at 7.1% and expected to continue to rise through the end of the year. An 8% rate could be reached by September or October – 8% represents significant economic pain. McDonnell should expect and be preemptive in addressing the Democratic pummeling that he will take for his stance that Virginia should turn down $125 million in unemployment aid assistance from the federal government.

Transportation - This is an issue near and dear to both the Tidewater and northern Virginia areas. Virginians lean heavily towards the Democrats (43% to 29%) as having answers on this topic. McDonnell needs to get out front and be very specific about how he would handle transportation issues. His best defense would be a strong offense.

Taxes - McDonnell has voter confidence on this issue (44% v 36%), but this needs to translate into votes. Virginia’s infrastructure needs to move forward and this will cost. “Cutting taxes” is probably not a winning mantra when compared to the rhetoric of a balanced budget, pay-as-you-go spending and fiscal responsibility.

Demographics - There needs to be a special effort to reach the young and to attract the diversity of Virginia’s people. One of the bellweather locales to watch is Prince William County, Virginia. Prince William still strongly supports Republicans locally but has increasingly leaned Democratic in state and national elections. If you can win in Prince William then chances are strong for a win in Virginia as a whole.

Focus on Issues/Talk to Virginia – Tell Virginia voters why they should vote Republican. An example of McDonnell’s challenge was a July 5th two-page article and interview in the Washington (DC) Examiner – a paper very friendly to both conservatives and to Republicans, and widely read in northern Virginia.

The Examiner article, entitled ‘Bob McDonnell reaches out – Virginia’s poised and polished GOP nominee tries to connect with voters‘, spent much of its print space deflecting criticism that he is too conservative.

This article turned out to be a missed opportunity. The closest that the Examiner and McDonnell came to outlining why Virginians should vote for him in November, “I am the same person I’ve been for 18 years in elected office. I’m a happy, positive, friendly conservative, but I’m also a pro-free enterprise, pro-life, pro-economic development conservative. These are all consistent.

Virginia needs to hear much more from Bob McDonnell, and much more soon so Republicans can win in November.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Democratic Party, Election 2010, Employment, Politics, Progressive Movement, Republican Party, Virginia